Ed has been involved in the motion picture industry for longer than he would like to remember. He is interviewed
by Monty Hayes McMillan, High Tech Media Director of Photography.
Monty: Hey, Ed, thanks for joining us. I've known you for decades and have heard a lot of your great stories, but I'd like our readers to know about your varied career in the industry.
Ed: Yes, Monty, you're right about that, it has been varied. I've photo assisted, worked as a catalogue and a multimedia photographer, had a set construction company, built lighting rigs for car shooters, worked in an effects house, had my own machine shop where I built rigging for motion control cameramen, worked at and then managed Ray M. Johnson Studio until they became a casualty of "runaway production". RJS made hero packaging, graphics and props for TV and motion pictures.
Monty: You began in still photography, right? How did that happen?
Ed: I got a BA at Brooks Institute on the G.I. bill with the intention of either becoming a photojournalist or an advertising photographer. I got a little side- tracked.
Monty: When we first met you were working with some really famous still photographers in LA, back during the 70s and early 80s. What was the most interesting shoot you worked on, what did you do on it, and how did that influence the rest of your career?
Ed: I worked with Jerry Trafficanda, Marv Lyons, Reid Miles, Gill Smith, Jim Wood, and John Bilecky to name a few.
But the most influential job I was on was the first. Harry Lyles was a guest instructor up at Brooks and very graciously gave his advanced class a open invitation to stop in at his studio in LA at any time. When I was there he was shooting a Tide commercial. I was shocked to find that they shot it reversed. He first shot the scene were mom pulls the "T" shirt out of the dryer. "My goodness, look at how Tide got Johnny's shirt so sparkling white!" Then they smeared mustard and ketchup all over it and shot the mom saying, "Oh my! Look at how dirty Johnny got his shirt. Tide will have it's work cut out for it this time."
I thought , they make money doing this? My soul was sold and my fate sealed. Plus Life Magazine folded about the time I started at Brooks.
Monty: Tell us about working with Polaroids. Do you think that digital cameras can totally fulfill the same purpose?
Ed: Bilecky shot almost exclusively 8X10 and used cases of 8X10 Polaroid®. At $10 a pop it got expensive. If you are shooting film it's a quick way to check composition, exposure and lighting contrast ratios. After using Polaroid for awhile you know the difference between the 'roid and what your film will hold. If you shoot film, and there are reasons to do so, Polaroid is handy, digital isn't much help.
Fortunately Fuji makes a Polaroid type product in 4X5 and 2-1/4 along with 4x5 and Hasselblad backs for the film. Also, I have been told that someone has bought the rights to make Polaroid film, so don't through out your Polaroid® backs....yet. For those of you who have gone digital - LEARN PHOTOSHOP! And I don't mean just well enough to tinker around in it. If you really learn to use Photoshop's full potential you will have an amazing amount of control over your images. Things can be done in Photoshop that we didn't even dream about at Brooks. Things that we could do, like separating out the color layers in a dye transfer and individually manipulating the color curves, could take hours in the darkroom. The best book out on Photoshop that I have found is by Focal Press: "Adobe Photoshop for Photographers" by Martin Evening. While on the digital subject, quite often people shoot 4X5 or 2-1/4 transparencies and scan them multiple times to capture detail. For instance, once for the hi-light detail, once for mid- tones, and once to capture shadow detail; then layer the scans in register in Photoshop and use transparency masking to work them together as one image.
If you are having problems getting the images to register, it could be because scanners wear out. The tracking mechanism loses its tolerances and the scans come out very slightly elongated. Because the scanner is worn the elongation is variable, the images then don't register. It only takes three or four years of frequent use for this to happen.
Monty: Besides size, what is the biggest difference between large format and 35 mm photography, in either the handling of it or the quality of the image?
Ed: The quality is there if you go digital and stay with the real top end cameras. 35 mm film is convenient but with large format photography you have swings and tilts - the ultimate control in perspective and focus. If I'm taking a 3/4 view of a car on large format, by slight swings of the back film plane I can add or subtract perspective. By slight swings on the lens I can change the plane of focus. If you need that you need large format.
PC lenses are useful but very limited. It's true you can control perspective digitally, however if shooting large format, and you know what you're doing, it only takes a few seconds to adjust perspective with a swing or tilt. That's why Architectural photographers and some car shooters still use 4X5. Plus you cannot change your plane of focus digitally.
Monty: How and why did you get into set design and construction?
Ed: At the time I was assisting John Bilecky who shot mostly cars and did both stills and TV commercials. I took one look at a set and saw how they were slapped together (I come from a tradition of cabinet makers and shipwrights going back to the 1600's) and told Bilecky, "I can do this", so I did. It paid better. Later I started building lighting rigs for him. I did a 8' x 24' aluminum truss box light that came apart in four pieces for taking out on locations. That was a big light for the time. It was before Fisher Light existed. He also liked to fly stretched muslin flats and bounce 10K Big Eyes into them. The biggest stretched muslin flat I ever made was 16' by 60'. It was a monster to hang. |